Chelsea

Chelsea

Premier League • England

Exclusive: Chelsea push to finalise blockbuster signing of Man Utd target ‘this week’

Chelsea and Man Utd are battling to sign Crystal Palace star Michael Olise

Chelsea and Man Utd are battling to sign Crystal Palace star Michael Olise

Chelsea are working hard to secure a deal for Crystal Palace playmaker Michael Olise and TEAMtalk can reveal that talks will intensify this week.

The Blues have been given the green light from the player’s camp that he would be happy to make the switch to Stamford Bridge but they’ll have to agree a deal with the Eagles first.

Sources have confirmed to TEAMtalk that talks will focus on how a deal can be structured that reaches the release clause in Olise’s contract – understood to be set at £58m.

We understand that Chelsea are willing to pay over his £58m clause to secure a deal but they aren’t under any immediate pressure to do so from Palace or their rivals.

There have recently been suggestions that Enzo Maresca’s side will have to overpay to beat Bayern Munich to Olise’s signature. However, TEAMtalk sources say there is “real confidence” at Stamford Bridge that they’ll win the race for the talented 22-year-old.

EXCLUSIVEMan Utd line up swap deal for ex-Chelsea man as Ratcliffe eyes Jarrad Branthwaite alternative

Olise is set to be one of the biggest names of the summer window.

Bayern and Newcastle are both keen on the Palace star and Manchester City also hold an interest in him, but the main rival to Chelsea for Olise remains Manchester United.

Chelsea confident of securing Michael Olise deal

TEAMtalk understands that there will be movement from Man Utd in the coming weeks in the race for Olise. Sir Jim Ratcliffe is a big admirer of his and wants to make him his statement signing of the summer.

The French international is a Red Devils supporter and in many people’s eyes that put them at the front of the queue, but there are doubts that they can financially compete with Chelsea should a bidding war begin.

Erik ten Hag’s side are also under pressure as Chelsea have moved quicker than anticipated in the race.

As mentioned, talks with Crystal Palace will centre around a “structured deal” that the Blues’ negotiators have very good experience in getting over the line.

They have recently signed Moises Caicedo and Enzo Fernandez in deals that were heavily structured with a sizeable fee paid upfront.

The devil will be in the detail with a deal for Olise though as sources have told TEAMtalk that Palace will not settle for add-ons and clauses that are not seen as realistic.

The Eagles, quite rightly, want to be in a position to strengthen their own squad this summer after enjoying a fantastic end to 2023/24 under Oliver Glasner.

TEAMtalk can confirm that Palace would rather sell Olise him earlier in the window to give themselves time to find an adequate replacement.

Talks will continue this week and Chelsea remain confident that they’ll get their man.

DON’T MISSMan Utd midfield targets: EVERY option linked for the summer 2024 transfer window

 

Question 1
Cole Palmer cost Chelsea an initial £40m. Was the initial price they paid for Benoit Badiashile higher or lower?
Use Hint
Higher
Lower
Question 2
Badiashile cost Chelsea £35m. Was the initial price they paid for Nicolas Jackson higher or lower?
Use Hint
Higher
Lower
Question 3
Jackson cost Chelsea £32m. Was the initial price they paid for Axel Disasi higher or lower?
Use Hint
Higher
Lower
Question 4
Disasi cost Chelsea £38.8m. Was the initial price they paid for Raheem Sterling higher or lower?
Use Hint
Higher
Lower
Question 5
Sterling cost Chelsea £47.5m. Was the initial price they paid for Christopher Nkunku higher or lower?
Use Hint
Higher
Lower
Question 6
Nkunku cost Chelsea £52m. Was the initial price they paid for Romeo Lavia higher or lower?
Use Hint
Higher
Lower
Question 7
Lavia cost Chelsea £53m. Was the initial price they paid for Ben Chilwell higher or lower?
Use Hint
Higher
Lower
Question 8
Chilwell cost Chelsea £45.18m. Was the initial price they paid for Noni Madueke higher or lower?
Use Hint
Higher
Lower
Question 9
Madueke cost Chelsea £29m. Was the initial price they paid for Malo Gusto higher or lower?
Use Hint
Higher
Lower
Question 10
Gusto cost Chelsea £26.3m. Was the initial price they paid for Wesley Fofana higher or lower?
Use Hint
Higher
Lower
Question 11
Fofana cost Chelsea £75m. Was the initial price they paid for Mykhaylo Mudryk higher or lower?
Use Hint
Higher
Lower
Question
Skip
Your score
0/11
Share your result
Leaderboard
Rank Player Games Score Time
Join the community
The best way to keep in touch and to be informed of our latest quizzes and competitions, as well as news and offers.
or
By registering you agree to our Terms of Service and Privacy Policy and are aged 16 or over
Already have an account? Log in
This page will close automatically once you have completed the authorisation process
Keep in the Know
Would you like to be kept informed about new quizzes and offers from Kwizly and its partners?
Validate Your Mobile No.
We have sent a code to . Please enter it below to verify your account.
Update mobile number
Resend code
Update Your Mobile No.
You may enter a new mobile number below. You will be sent a verification code to the phone number you provide.
Cancel
Hint Activated
Answer the question below to remove one of the incorrect options.
Validate Your Email Address
We have sent a code to . Please enter it below to verify your account.
Update email address
Resend code
Update Your Email Address
You may enter a new email address below. You will be sent a verification code to the address you provide.
Cancel
Create a Username
This will be publicly viewable so make it something you like!
Reset your password
Enter your email address below. If it is registered with us, we will email you a code that will allow you to reset your password.
Check your inbox
If your email address was found in our system, you should receive an email in the next few minutes containing a code. Enter that code below to reset your password.
Set new password
Please enter your new password below.